Now I’m the first to admit that I don’t know from world affairs. My perspective and information is more local.
But to sum up the situation in Iran that’s (allegedly) driving gas prices even higher, the key facts are these:
- Iran wants to develop nuclear technology and the ability to enrich uranium, ostensibly to provide themselves with energy, and
- we trust Iran about as far as one could fling a reasonably tolerant badger.
So here’s my idea.
We offer to build and operate the nuclear power plants, and refine and transport the nuclear materials ourselves, in exchange for oil, which Iran has aplenty.
If they decline, they’ve lost credibility with the court of public opinion, which frees us to deal more sternly with the issue.
If they agree, we get:
- some assurance that their intentions are good,
- oil, which we need,
- control over the disputed substances, and
- more stabilizing presence in the region, meaning we can take a step back from being the world’s policeman.
Iran gets
- the energy they claim to seek,
- credibility and goodwill,
- increased stability, and
- no responsibility for the hazardous materials.
Sounds to me like everyone wins.
I’m still looking for the “It’s a great thought, but it could never work because…” aspect and I can’t see one. Anyone, feel free to correct me.