When a large number of people differ with a liberal’s viewpoint, the liberal immediately begins speaking of “outreach programs” and “educating the public”.
The concept that their own position might need to be reevaluated honestly never occurs to them. I see this disconnect as a glaring weakness in the liberal thought process, as well as an annoying elitist tiara.
On the other hand, in a disagreement a conservative tends to simply say, “I think you’re wrong”– which at least opens the door for the possibility of discussion.
I think highly of the person who can place their argument on the table and respond to disagreement with “Tell me your thoughts. Convince me.”
Continually testing one’s point of view in the harsh light of public evaluation is the mark of someone who values truth above ego.
This post wasn’t funny at all. I should have followed Dave Barry’s advice and inserted the word “weasel” somewhere.